Re: 9.2 pg_upgrade regression tests on WIndows

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-09-03T17:49:58Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 09/03/2012 12:58 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> My intentions over the next hour or two are to commit the
>> unix-socket-directory fix and then sync 9.2 pg_upgrade with HEAD
>> (ie, back-patch everything that's in HEAD except the int64-XLogRecPtr
>> changes).  Will that cause any problems for what you're doing?

> No, go for it. I can sync up without difficulty. Does that include 
> backpatching the exec_prog changes to 9.2?

Yes, nobody objected, so I'll do that too.

			regards, tom lane