Re: BUG #17158: Distinct ROW fails with Postgres 14
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>
Cc: sait.nisanci@microsoft.com,
PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>,
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Date: 2021-08-24T14:03:26Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> writes:
> It looks like 01e658fa74 is to blame for this.
> The test case can be simplified down to just:
> create table local (b bit);
> insert into local values('1'),('0');
> SELECT DISTINCT ROW(b) FROM local;
> Tom did have a look at this and raise the question about the
> possibility of not being able to hash in [1].
Huh. According to the thread, we discussed this exact possibility and
there's a test case verifying it ... so apparently something got
fat-fingered there.
> If it's going to be a problem detecting the lack of hashability during
> planning then maybe we can just add a hash opclass for BIT to fix this
> particular case.
Most certainly not. That would translate to a requirement that EVERY
data type have a hash function.
regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Fix hash_array
- 9b2fd490577b 14.0 landed
- 851ff9335742 15.0 landed
-
Disable anonymous record hash support except in special cases
- 054adca641ac 14.0 landed
- a3d2b1bbe904 15.0 landed