Horton

Re: Shaky coding for vacuuming partitioned relations

Amit Langote <langote_amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
To: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-09-26T08:59:30Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On 2017/09/26 11:12, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Amit Langote
> <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> I think that's right, although, I don't see any new RangeVar created under
>> vacuum() at the moment.  Maybe, you're referring to the Nathan's patch
>> that perhaps does that.
> 
> Yes, you can check what it does here (last version):
> 766556DD-AA3C-42F7-ACF4-5DC97F41F151@amazon.com

Thanks, will look.

Regards,
Amit

Commits

  1. Fix inadequate locking during get_rel_oids().