Re: Pathify RHS unique-ification for semijoin planning

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

To: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>

Cc: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>

Date: 2025-08-12T16:38:19Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

Simplify relation_has_unique_index_for()
- bf9ee294e567 19 (unreleased) landed
Pathify RHS unique-ification for semijoin planning
- 24225ad9aafc 19 (unreleased) landed
Convert varatt.h access macros to static inline functions.
- e035863c9a04 19 (unreleased) cited
Re-export a few of createplan.c's make_xxx() functions.
- 570be1f73f38 9.6.0 cited

=?utf-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro?= Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de> writes:
> No review, but apparently "uniquify" is more widely accepted than
> "uniqueify".

Personally I'd write "unique-ify", seeing that neither of the forms
without the dash are considered good English.  Of course, if you
need to make identifiers out of this, that solution doesn't work;
but you could just avoid the construction --- say, "make_path_unique"
rather than "uniquify_path".

			regards, tom lane