Re: [HACKERS] Re: v7.1b4 bad performance
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>
Cc: peter.schmidt@prismedia.com, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, pgsql-admin@postgresql.org
Date: 2001-02-17T06:59:59Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp> writes: > I agree with Tom. I did some benchmarking tests using pgbench for a > computer magazine in Japan. I got a almost equal or better result for > 7.1 than 7.0.3 if commit_delay=0. See included png file. Interesting curves. One thing you might like to know is that while poking around with a profiler this afternoon, I found that the vast majority of the work done for this benchmark is in the uniqueness checks driven by the unique indexes. Declare those as plain (non unique) and the TPS figures would probably go up noticeably. That doesn't make the test invalid, but it does suggest that pgbench is emphasizing one aspect of system performance to the exclusion of others ... regards, tom lane