Re: `pg_ctl init` crashes when run concurrently; semget(2) suspected

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Gavin Panella <gavinpanella@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2025-08-11T23:41:07Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Gavin Panella <gavinpanella@gmail.com> writes:
> With that fix applied to REL_17_5 things are working well. Limiting the
> search sounds like an improvement too.

Cool.  I'll push the fix after our release freeze lifts.

> Then I thought: I'm only seeing the log from one of those instances, yet
> they're all going through the same search for free semaphore sets. That's a
> few system calls going to waste. Maybe not important in the big picture,
> but it gave me an idea to left shift nextSemaKey in PGReserveSemaphores,
> i.e. `nextSemaKey = statbuf.st_ino << 4`, to give each pg_ctl process a few
> guaranteed uncontested keys (at least, uncontested between themselves). In
> a small test this eliminated contention for semaphore sets due to
> concurrency. It is more of an optimisation though, rather than a bug fix.

Meh ... if we thought this was worth worrying about, I'd be more
inclined to run the st_ino through a hash function to spread out the
possible values a little more.  But I think in nearly all scenarios
it'd be a waste of effort.  If collisions were probable we'd have
found this issue years ago.

			regards, tom lane



Commits

  1. Don't treat EINVAL from semget() as a hard failure.

  2. Give up on running with NetBSD/OpenBSD's default semaphore settings.