Re: Shutting down a warm standby database in
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Stephen Harris <lists@spuddy.org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2006-11-30T20:59:15Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers, pgsql-general
Stephen Harris <lists@spuddy.org> writes: > Starting up the standby database still goes back to earlier log files, > but I guess that's the 100 checkpoint thing you mentioned earlier. Actually I was misremembering that: the frequency of recovery checkpoints is time-based, and for a slave that's in sync with its master, they should occur about as often as checkpoints on the master. So the amount of log to be replayed should be comparable to what the master would have to replay if it crashed. regards, tom lane