Re: Multiple setup steps for isolation tests

"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes:
>> Tom Lane  wrote:
>> The grammar changes look wrong: I think you eliminated the ability
>> to have zero setup steps, no? Instead, setup_list should expand to
>> either empty or "setup_list setup".
 
> I tried that first, but had shift/reduce conflicts.

[ scratches head ... ]  Dunno what you did exactly, but the attached
version works fine for me.

			regards, tom lane