Re: Help with count(*)

Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee> writes:
> Christopher Browne kirjutas R, 14.11.2003 kell 16:13:
>> I have seen this happen somewhat-invisibly when a JDBC connection
>> manager opens transactions for each connection, and then no processing
>> happens to use those connections for a long time.  The open
>> transactions prevent vacuums from doing any good...

> Can't the backend be made to delay the "real" start of transaction until
> the first query gets executed ?

That is on the TODO list.  I looked at it briefly towards the end of the
7.4 development cycle, and decided that it was nontrivial and I didn't
have time to make it happen before beta started.  I don't recall why it
didn't seem trivial.

			regards, tom lane