Horton

Re: PG vs macOS Mojave

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>, Jakob Egger <jakob@eggerapps.at>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2018-11-02T15:09:54Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
>> On 2 Nov 2018, at 15:42, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Anybody have an opinion about which approach to use?  We need to choose
>> one, and PDQ too, if we want full buildfarm coverage on it before Monday's
>> wrap.

> #1 is the option that appeals to me the most, mostly because it removes all
> possible ambiguity of when/if it’s required compared to #2.

I'm sort of leaning in that direction too, after sleeping on it.
It's also closer to what we already shipped in 11.0 than #2 is.

			regards, tom lane

Commits

  1. Yet further rethinking of build changes for macOS Mojave.

  2. Still further rethinking of build changes for macOS Mojave.

  3. Back off using -isysroot on Darwin.

  4. Make some fixes to allow building Postgres on macOS 10.14 ("Mojave").