Re: Why our Valgrind reports suck

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2025-08-03T02:03:49Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com> writes:
>> This is very useful work; I hope we can get it in soon.

> Thanks for looking at it!

Pushed, after squashing related commits, changing the pq_mq_handle
bit as you suggested, and fixing one more leak report that I don't
think was there in May.  There's still work to be done here, but
now we have a pretty good foundation for chasing remaining leaks.

			regards, tom lane



Commits

  1. Undo thinko in commit e78d1d6d4.

  2. Avoid leakage of zero-length arrays in partition_bounds_copy().

  3. Fix MemoryContextAllocAligned's interaction with Valgrind.

  4. Fix assorted pretty-trivial memory leaks in the backend.

  5. Improve our support for Valgrind's leak tracking.

  6. Reduce leakage during PL/pgSQL function compilation.

  7. Silence Valgrind leakage complaints in more-or-less-hackish ways.

  8. Silence complaints about leaks in PlanCacheComputeResultDesc.

  9. Suppress complaints about leaks in TS dictionary loading.

  10. Suppress complaints about leaks in function cache loading.

  11. Fix per-relation memory leakage in autovacuum.

  12. Fix AlignedAllocRealloc to cope sanely with OOM.