Re: Making Vars outer-join aware

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "Anton A. Melnikov" <aamelnikov@inbox.ru>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>, Richard Guo <guofenglinux@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, "Finnerty, Jim" <jfinnert@amazon.com>
Date: 2023-05-04T12:22:04Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Re-allow INDEX_VAR as rt_index in ChangeVarNodes().

  2. Fix thinkos in have_unsafe_outer_join_ref; reduce to Assert check.

  3. Invent "join domains" to replace the below_outer_join hack.

  4. Do assorted mop-up in the planner.

  5. Make Vars be outer-join-aware.

  6. Invent "multibitmapsets", and use them to speed up antijoin detection.

  7. Add basic regression tests for semi/antijoin recognition.

  8. Improve performance of adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel.

  9. Refactor addition of PlaceHolderVars to joinrel targetlists.

  10. Use an explicit state flag to control PlaceHolderInfo creation.

  11. Make PlaceHolderInfo lookup O(1).

"Anton A. Melnikov" <aamelnikov@inbox.ru> writes:
> The thing is that for custom scan nodes as readme says:
> "INDEX_VAR is abused to signify references to columns of a custom scan tuple type"
> But INDEX_VAR has a negative value, so it can not be used in varnullingrels bitmapset.
> And therefore this improvement seems will not work with custom scan nodes and some
> extensions that use such nodes.

Under what circumstances would you be trying to inject INDEX_VAR
into a nullingrel set?  Only outer-join relids should ever appear there.
AFAICS the change you propose would serve only to mask bugs.

			regards, tom lane