Re: Temporary tables prevent autovacuum, leading to XID wraparound
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com, robertmhaas@gmail.com,
pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2018-08-08T14:50:34Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > Unnoticed ABI breaks make my hair stand on end. Yeah. > I'm unsure about pg11 -- is it a backbranch already or not? Since we've > released beta3 already, ISTM we should consider it so. No. See https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/12725.1533737052%40sss.pgh.pa.us At this point I'd judge it's still more valuable to minimize differences between v11 and v12 than to avoid ABI breakages in v11. It's unlikely this would be the last ABI break before 11.0 anyway. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Clarify comment about assignment and reset of temp namespace ID in MyProc
- 9fc9933695af 11.0 landed
- 1339fcc89617 12.0 landed
-
Make autovacuum more aggressive to remove orphaned temp tables
- 943576bddcb5 11.0 landed
- 246a6c8f7b23 12.0 landed
-
Don't count background workers against a user's connection limit.
- 13752743bf70 9.6.2 cited