Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>
Cc: Daniel Farina <daniel@heroku.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2013-03-10T18:32:53Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp> writes:
> [ pgsql-v9.3-writable-fdw-poc.v12.part-1/2.patch ]

Applied after rather extensive editorialization.  DELETE RETURNING in
particular was a mess, and I also tried to make SELECT FOR UPDATE behave
in what seemed like a sane fashion.

There's a lot left to do here of course.  One thing I was wondering
about was why we don't allow DEFAULTs to be attached to foreign-table
columns.  There was no use in it before, but it seems sensible enough
now.

			regards, tom lane


Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Fix postgres_fdw's issues with inconsistent interpretation of data values.