Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>
Cc: Daniel Farina <daniel@heroku.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2013-03-10T18:32:53Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp> writes: > [ pgsql-v9.3-writable-fdw-poc.v12.part-1/2.patch ] Applied after rather extensive editorialization. DELETE RETURNING in particular was a mess, and I also tried to make SELECT FOR UPDATE behave in what seemed like a sane fashion. There's a lot left to do here of course. One thing I was wondering about was why we don't allow DEFAULTs to be attached to foreign-table columns. There was no use in it before, but it seems sensible enough now. regards, tom lane
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Fix postgres_fdw's issues with inconsistent interpretation of data values.
- cc3f281ffb0a 9.3.0 cited