Re: SELECT ... FOR UPDATE [WAIT integer | NOWAIT] for 8.5
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>, Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Hans-Juergen Schoenig <postgres@cybertec.at>, Sándor Miglécz <sandor@cybertec.at>
Date: 2009-09-23T16:20:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes: > Jeff, >> Will statement_timeout not suffice for that use case? > Well, currently statement_timeout doesn't affect waiting for locks. Sure it does. > And as a DBA, I don't think I'd want the same timeout for executing > queries as for waiting for a lock. Well, that's exactly what Jeff is questioning. How big is the use-case for that exactly? regards, tom lane