Re: pg_upgrade test for binary compatibility of core data types

Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>, Jacob Champion <pchampion@vmware.com>
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, buschmann@nidsa.net, noah@leadboat.com, tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com, bruce@momjian.us, andres@anarazel.de
Date: 2021-09-12T18:41:23Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs, pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Move into separate file all the SQL queries used in pg_upgrade tests

  2. Add table to regression tests for binary-compatibility checks in pg_upgrade

  3. Fix tests of pg_upgrade across different major versions

  4. Multirange datatypes

  5. Work around cross-version-upgrade issues created by commit 9e38c2bb5.

  6. Declare assorted array functions using anycompatible not anyelement.

  7. Remove factorial operators, leaving only the factorial() function.

  8. Create by default sql/ and expected/ for output directory in pg_regress

  9. Add missing include to pg_upgrade/version.c

  10. Improve the check for pg_catalog.line data type in pg_upgrade

  11. Improve the check for pg_catalog.unknown data type in pg_upgrade

  12. Check for tables with sql_identifier during pg_upgrade

  13. pg_upgrade: clarify the database names in error files

  14. In the pg_upgrade test suite, don't write to src/test/regress.

  15. Allow group access on PGDATA

  16. Refactor dir/file permissions

  17. Remove unused functions in regress.c.

  18. Make WAL segment size configurable at initdb time.

  19. Fix bit-rot in pg_upgrade's test.sh, and improve documentation.

On 9/11/21 8:51 PM, Justin Pryzby wrote:
>
> @Andrew: did you have any comment on this part ?
>
> |Subject: buildfarm xversion diff
> |Forking https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20210328231433.GI15100@telsasoft.com
> |
> |I gave suggestion how to reduce the "lines of diff" metric almost to nothing,
> |allowing a very small "fudge factor", and which I think makes this a pretty
> |good metric rather than a passable one.
>

Somehow I missed that. Looks like some good suggestions. I'll
experiment. (Note: we can't assume the presence of sed, especially on
Windows).


cheers


andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com