Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>,
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>,
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>,
Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>,
David Fetter <david@fetter.org>,
Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-01-29T20:46:41Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Prevent inlining of multiply-referenced CTEs with outer recursive refs.
- 9476131278c7 12.0 landed
-
Allow user control of CTE materialization, and change the default behavior.
- 608b167f9f9c 12.0 landed
-
Split QTW_EXAMINE_RTES flag into QTW_EXAMINE_RTES_BEFORE/_AFTER.
- 18c0da88a5d9 12.0 landed
-
document when PREPARE uses generic plans
- fab9d1da4a21 9.6.0 cited
Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 1:53 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I propose that we implement and document this as
>> WITH ctename AS [ MATERIALIZE { ON | OFF } ] ( query )
> I hate to bikeshed here, but I think it's better english using that
> style of syntax to say,
> WITH ctename AS [ MATERIALIZATION { ON | OFF } ] ( query )
Hm. Doesn't really seem to fit with our style for options elsewhere;
for instance, EXPLAIN's options are things like ANALYZE ON/OFF and
VERBOSE ON/OFF, not ANALYSIS and VERBOSITY.
regards, tom lane