Horton

Re: Re: PANIC: invalid index offnum: 186 when processing BRIN indexes in VACUUM

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-11-02T16:20:48Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
>> Hmm, I'm pretty sure we stress-tested brin in pretty much the same way.
>> But I see this misbehavior too.  Looking ...

> Turns out that this is related to concurrent growth of the table while
> the summarization process is scanning -- so new pages have appeared at
> the end of the table after the end point has been determined.  It would
> be a pain to determine number of blocks for each range, so I'm looking
> for a simple way to fix it without imposing so much overhead.

Where are we on this --- do you want me to push the brin_doupdate
fix I proposed, or were you intending to merge that into a
larger patch?  If I'm to do it, is there a reason not to back-patch
to all branches with BRIN?

			regards, tom lane

Commits

  1. Fix BRIN summarization concurrent with extension

  2. Fix corner-case errors in brin_doupdate().

  3. Rewrite PageIndexDeleteNoCompact into a form that only deletes 1 tuple.

  4. Invent PageIndexTupleOverwrite, and teach BRIN and GiST to use it.

  5. Close some holes in BRIN page assignment