Re: BUG #15940: json_populate_recordset fails with ERROR: record type has not been registered

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>, yarexeray@gmail.com, pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2019-08-19T22:04:25Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 02:53:45PM -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote:
>> For posterity I agree that OP was essentially exploiting undefined, or
>> at least poorly defined, behavior.  For my money, I'd advise using
>> this function for cases where you don't want to use an in place type,
>> just a column list:

> If I were to change something here, that would be this error string
> exposed to the user.  With the current error, there is no real way
> that the user knows what is wrong and why he/she should not do that.
> Could it be possible to add some recommendation for example on top of
> an error "cannot do that because blah"?

I concluded that we'd better restore the former behavior, or people
will complain that this is a regression.  We can however do better
than the "record type has not been registered" error, at least for
the case where the error is being thrown at runtime.  I went with

ERROR:  could not determine row type for result of json_populate_record
HINT:  Provide a non-null record argument, or call the function in the FROM clause using a column definition list.

			regards, tom lane



Commits

  1. Restore json{b}_populate_record{set}'s ability to take type info from AS.

  2. Support domains over composite types.