Re: Something for the TODO list: deprecating abstime and friends
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
Mark Dilger <hornschnorter@gmail.com>,
"pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-07-19T20:19:10Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 8:56 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> I wonder if it'd be worth the trouble to stick something like this into >> xlog.c: >> StaticAssertStmt(sizeof(ControlFileData) <= 512, >> "pg_control is too large for atomic disk writes"); > +1. Even if it just gets triggered in 20 years by some hacker, that's > a good reminder about assumptions behind the update logic. Done. I found the size checks had metastasized into pg_resetwal as well, and probably should have been in pg_rewind since it also rewrites pg_control, so it ended up a slightly larger patch than I first thought. Seems cleaner than before though. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Add static assertions about pg_control fitting into one disk sector.
- 3cb29c42f990 10.0 landed
-
doc: Remove PostgreSQL version number from xml2 deprecation notice
- 3163baa6d2d1 9.3.0 cited