Re: Something for the TODO list: deprecating abstime and friends

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Mark Dilger <hornschnorter@gmail.com>, "pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-07-19T20:19:10Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 8:56 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I wonder if it'd be worth the trouble to stick something like this into
>> xlog.c:
>> StaticAssertStmt(sizeof(ControlFileData) <= 512,
>> "pg_control is too large for atomic disk writes");

> +1. Even if it just gets triggered in 20 years by some hacker, that's
> a good reminder about assumptions behind the update logic.

Done.  I found the size checks had metastasized into pg_resetwal as well,
and probably should have been in pg_rewind since it also rewrites
pg_control, so it ended up a slightly larger patch than I first thought.
Seems cleaner than before though.

			regards, tom lane


Commits

  1. Add static assertions about pg_control fitting into one disk sector.

  2. doc: Remove PostgreSQL version number from xml2 deprecation notice