Re: Problems with plan estimates in postgres_fdw
Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>
From: Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>
To: Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>,
pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2019-02-22T15:21:41Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > (2019/02/08 21:35), Etsuro Fujita wrote: > > (2019/02/08 2:04), Antonin Houska wrote: > >> * regression tests: I think test(s) should be added for queries that have > >> ORDER BY clause but do not have GROUP BY (and also no LIMIT / OFFSET) > >> clause. I haven't noticed such tests. > > > > Will do. > > I noticed that such queries would be processed by what we already have for > sort pushdown (ie, add_paths_with_pathkeys_for_rel()). I might be missing > something, though. What about an ORDER BY expression that contains multiple Var nodes? For example SELECT * FROM foo ORDER BY x + y; I think the base relation should not be able to generate paths with the corresponding pathkeys, since its target should (besides PlaceHolderVars, which should not appear in the plan of this simple query at all) only emit individual Vars. -- Antonin Houska https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
Commits
-
postgres_fdw: Perform the (FINAL, NULL) upperrel operations remotely.
- d50d172e517c 12.0 landed
-
Refactor create_limit_path() to share cost adjustment code with FDWs.
- aef65db6769e 12.0 landed
-
postgres_fdw: Modify regression tests for EPQ-related planning problems.
- 0269edefacb7 12.0 landed
-
postgres_fdw: Perform the (ORDERED, NULL) upperrel operations remotely.
- ffab494a4d46 12.0 landed
-
Save PathTargets for distinct/ordered relations in root->upper_targets[].
- 3fdc374b5d24 12.0 landed
-
Split create_foreignscan_path() into three functions.
- 34ea1ab7fd30 12.0 cited
-
Fix test case for 'outer pathkeys do not match mergeclauses' fix.
- 99f6a17dd62a 11.0 cited
-
postgres_fdw: Avoid 'outer pathkeys do not match mergeclauses' error.
- 4bbf6edfbd5d 11.0 cited