Re: Underscore in positional parameters?

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Erik Wienhold <ewie@ewie.name>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2024-07-02T14:21:58Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Erik Wienhold <ewie@ewie.name> writes:
> On 2024-07-02 10:45 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> I had to revert the test case from the 0002 patch.  It ended up running some
>> build farm machines out of memory.

>> +ERROR:  out of memory
>> +DETAIL:  Failed on request of size 1073741820 in memory context "PortalContext".

> That means paramno is less than MaxAllocSize/sizeof(Oid) if it tries to
> allocate memory.  MaxAllocSize is always 0x3fffffff.  Is sizeof(Oid)
> less than 4 on those machines?

No.  Y'know, it's not really *that* astonishing for a machine to not
have a spare 1GB of RAM available on-demand.  This test would
certainly have failed on our 32-bit animals, although it doesn't
look like any of them had gotten to it yet.

			regards, tom lane



Commits

  1. Fix overflow in parsing of positional parameter

  2. Limit max parameter number with MaxAllocSize

  3. Re-forbid underscore in positional parameters