Re: reducing isolation tests runtime

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2019-02-13T18:01:52Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> Right, but why don't we allow for more tests in a group, and then use a
> default max_connections to limit concurrency? Having larger groups is
> advantageous wrt test runtime - it reduces the number of artificial
> serialization point where the slowest test slows things down.  Obviously
> there's still a few groups that are needed for test interdependency
> management, but that's comparatively rare. We have have plenty groups
> that are just broken up to stay below max_concurrent_tests.

Meh.  That would also greatly increase the scope for hard-to-reproduce
conflicts between concurrent tests.  I'm not especially excited about
going there.

			regards, tom lane


Commits

  1. Update obsolete sentence in README.parallel.

  2. Rewrite ConditionVariableBroadcast() to avoid live-lock.

  3. Tweak parallel hash join test case in hopes of improving stability.

  4. Rename pg_rewind's copy_file_range() to avoid conflict with new linux syscall.

  5. Fix some minor errors in new PHJ code.

  6. Fix EXPLAIN ANALYZE output for Parallel Hash.

  7. Fix rare assertion failure in parallel hash join.

  8. Cancel CV sleep during subtransaction abort.

  9. Add parallel-aware hash joins.

  10. Fix EXPLAIN ANALYZE of hash join when the leader doesn't participate.

  11. Add some regression tests that exercise hash join code.