Re: 回复:Why don't update minimum recovery point in xact_redo_abort
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
From: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
To: 蔡梦娟(玊于) <mengjuan.cmj@alibaba-inc.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-07-28T03:43:58Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2021/07/28 1:55, 蔡梦娟(玊于) wrote: > > Hi, Fujii > > Thanks for your reply. > And I want to share a patch about the bug with you, I add XLogFlush() in xact_redo_abort() to update the minimum recovery point. Thanks for the patch! It looks almost the same as the patch I posted upthread. One diff between them is that you copy-and-pasted the comments for update of minRecoveryPoint, but instead I just added the comment "See comments ... in xact_redo_commit()". IMO it's better to avoid putting the same (a bit long) comments in multiple places so that we can more easily maintain the comments. Regards, -- Fujii Masao Advanced Computing Technology Center Research and Development Headquarters NTT DATA CORPORATION
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Update minimum recovery point on truncation during WAL replay of abort record.
- 32d182dd0da9 9.6.23 landed
- 25fe5b2bb5fa 10.18 landed
- 02ef4d1e24b5 11.13 landed
- d7ded08e6e0e 12.8 landed
- a66b05b422d7 13.4 landed
- f2a3d7404e5d 14.0 landed
- a00c138b7852 15.0 landed
-
Update minimum recovery point on truncation.
- 7bffc9b7bf9e 9.3.0 cited