Re: Race conditions with checkpointer and shutdown
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Ashwin Agrawal <aagrawal@pivotal.io>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>,
Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2019-04-29T17:50:26Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Ashwin Agrawal <aagrawal@pivotal.io> writes: > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 10:36 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Can you try applying a1a789eb5ac894b4ca4b7742f2dc2d9602116e46 >> to see if it fixes the problem for you? > Yes, will give it a try on greenplum and report back the result. > Have we decided if this will be applied to back branches? My feeling about it is "maybe eventually, but most definitely not the week before a set of minor releases". Some positive experience with Greenplum would help increase confidence in the patch, for sure. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
In walreceiver, don't try to do ereport() in a signal handler.
- ac8f2e1ef34f 10.9 landed
- 9346d396fd4a 11.4 landed
- a1a789eb5ac8 12.0 landed