Re: Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects inherited from template1
Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>
From: Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: mhh@mindspring.com, Jan Wieck <janwieck@Yahoo.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2000-11-11T03:44:29Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
At 11:39 10/11/00 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>To bring this back from future nice solutions to the reality of what
>to do today, do people like the "template0" solution for now (7.1)?
>I can work on it if so.
>
Being able to create a vanilla DB is essential to make pg_dump work with
customized templates, and I can't think if a better solution. So yes, it's
definitely a good idea.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner | __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd. |----/ - \
(A.B.N. 75 008 659 498) | /(@) ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81 | _________ \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82 | ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au | / \|
| --________--
PGP key available upon request, | /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371 |/