Re: pg_dump & performance degradation

At 21:15 31/07/00 -0700, Don Baccus wrote:
>At 11:41 PM 7/31/00 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>I am more concerned with giving people a pg_dump option of questionable
>>value.  I don't have problems adding it to the C code because it may be
>>of use to some people.
>
>I'm uncomfortable because I know of no other *nix utility that has such
>options.
>
>If they exist, can someone enumerate them?
>
>It's hard to see why PG is such a special case in this regard, requiring
>such an overbearingly groty kludge.

Don't beat about the bush. What are you trying to say, here? ;-}.


----------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Warner                    |     __---_____
Albatross Consulting Pty. Ltd.   |----/       -  \
(A.C.N. 008 659 498)             |          /(@)   ______---_
Tel: (+61) 0500 83 82 81         |                 _________  \
Fax: (+61) 0500 83 82 82         |                 ___________ |
Http://www.rhyme.com.au          |                /           \|
                                 |    --________--
PGP key available upon request,  |  /
and from pgp5.ai.mit.edu:11371   |/