Re: [HACKERS] LZTEXT for rule plan stings
Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>
From: Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL HACKERS <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>
Date: 2000-02-26T18:55:12Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
At 12:15 PM 2/26/00 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >and (except for not using any excess whitespace) that is exactly what >goes into a rule action string. > >As you can see, this is very amenable to compression, especially >when you have a lot of columns in a view. > >Someday we might think about using a more compact representation for >stored rules, but there are advantages to using a format that's fairly >easy for a human to examine. Oh, now I understand, I didn't realize the tree was being stored in human-readable form as a string, but thought it was being parsed into a binary form. That's why I began having doubts that I might've triggered unecessary work on Jan's part regarding lztext. Yes, since it's stored as a text string lztext should help a LOT. - Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at http://donb.photo.net.