Re: [HACKERS] LZTEXT for rule plan stings

Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>

From: Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL HACKERS <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>
Date: 2000-02-26T18:55:12Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
At 12:15 PM 2/26/00 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:

>and (except for not using any excess whitespace) that is exactly what
>goes into a rule action string.
>
>As you can see, this is very amenable to compression, especially
>when you have a lot of columns in a view.
>
>Someday we might think about using a more compact representation for
>stored rules, but there are advantages to using a format that's fairly
>easy for a human to examine.

Oh, now I understand, I didn't realize the tree was being stored in
human-readable form as a string, but thought it was being parsed into
a binary form.  That's why I began having doubts that I might've triggered
unecessary work on Jan's part regarding lztext.  Yes, since it's
stored as a text string lztext should help a LOT.



- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com>
  Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
  Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
  http://donb.photo.net.