Re: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS

Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>

From: Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Jose Soares <jose@sferacarta.com>
Cc: hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>, general <pgsql-general@postgreSQL.org>
Date: 2000-02-22T18:47:16Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
At 11:32 AM 2/22/00 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:

>I see no way that allowing the transaction to commit after an overflow
>can be called consistent with the spec.

You are absolutely right.  The whole point is that either a) everything
commits or b) nothing commits.

Having some kinds of exceptions allow a partial commit while other
exceptions rollback the transaction seems like a very error-prone
programming environment to me.



- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com>
  Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
  Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
  http://donb.photo.net.