Re: [HACKERS] TRANSACTIONS
Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>
From: Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Jose Soares <jose@sferacarta.com>
Cc: hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org>, general <pgsql-general@postgreSQL.org>
Date: 2000-02-22T18:47:16Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
At 11:32 AM 2/22/00 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >I see no way that allowing the transaction to commit after an overflow >can be called consistent with the spec. You are absolutely right. The whole point is that either a) everything commits or b) nothing commits. Having some kinds of exceptions allow a partial commit while other exceptions rollback the transaction seems like a very error-prone programming environment to me. - Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at http://donb.photo.net.