Re: pg_dump & performance degradation

Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>

From: Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>
To: Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>, Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, brianb-pggeneral@edsamail.com
Date: 2000-08-01T13:05:53Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
At 02:31 PM 8/1/00 +1000, Philip Warner wrote:

>>Have you tried pg_dump on a multi-processor machine, which most serious
>>database-backed websites run on these days?   Do you see the same
performance
>>degradation?  My site runs on a dual P450 with RAID 1 LVD disks, and cost
>>me exactly $2100 to build (would've been less if I'd laid off the extra
>>cooling fans!)
>
>The original request came from a person with a "4-CPU Xeon with 2GB of
>RAM", but the "solution" does not seem to work for them (I think), so it's
>probably a waste of time.

It seems really strange that pg_dump could suck the guts out of a
four-processor
machine.  What kind of device were they backing up to?   Disk?





- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com>
  Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
  Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
  http://donb.photo.net.