Re: pg_dump & performance degradation
Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>
From: Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>
To: Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>, Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, brianb-pggeneral@edsamail.com
Date: 2000-08-01T13:05:53Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
At 02:31 PM 8/1/00 +1000, Philip Warner wrote: >>Have you tried pg_dump on a multi-processor machine, which most serious >>database-backed websites run on these days? Do you see the same performance >>degradation? My site runs on a dual P450 with RAID 1 LVD disks, and cost >>me exactly $2100 to build (would've been less if I'd laid off the extra >>cooling fans!) > >The original request came from a person with a "4-CPU Xeon with 2GB of >RAM", but the "solution" does not seem to work for them (I think), so it's >probably a waste of time. It seems really strange that pg_dump could suck the guts out of a four-processor machine. What kind of device were they backing up to? Disk? - Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at http://donb.photo.net.