Re: Big 7.1 open items
Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>
From: Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck@yahoo.com>, Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, "Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu>
Date: 2000-06-19T00:12:22Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
At 08:08 PM 6/18/00 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> Does your proposal break the smgr abstraction, i.e. does it >> preclude later efforts to (say) implement an (optional) >> raw-device storage manager? > >Seeing very few want that done, I don't see it as an issue at this >point. Sorry, I disagree. There's excuse for breaking existing abstractions unless there's a compelling reason to do so. My question should make it clear I was using a raw-device storage manager as an example. There are other possbilities, like a many-tables-per-file storage manager. - Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at http://donb.photo.net.