Re: [HACKERS] BSD vs. GPL
Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>
From: Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>
To: Clark Evans <clark.evans@manhattanproject.com>, Michael Alan Dorman <mdorman-pgsql.hackers@debian.org>, Michael Meskes <meskes@postgreSQL.org>, pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Date: 1999-06-21T03:50:06Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
At 10:14 PM 6/20/99 -0400, Clark Evans wrote: >However, RedHat's business is NOT distribution, it is >standardization. Thank God and I deleted the rest, thank you. > And this allows them to spend money >on open source _if_ it is in their best interest. Wow, a tautology! I've heard these are really hard to prove correct. > I would >argue that it is in their best interest now, but it >won't be in a few years after they have a fimly >established monopoly. > >Thus, your exceptions point to a deeper problem with >open source, rather than positive support for it. The deeper problem being that open source MIGHT become as tied to one vendor as closed source, if I read your argument correctly. Well, let's imagine for a moment that I concede that point... There's still a difference...you still get the source. I've got candles for sale if you need some to burn at your Open Source Means Everyone Works For Free Always shrine. - Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza@pacifier.com> Nature photos, on-line guides, and other goodies at http://donb.photo.net