Thread

Re: Asynchronous MergeAppend

Alexander Pyhalov <a.pyhalov@postgrespro.ru> — 2025-11-05T06:30:59Z

Hi.

Matheus Alcantara писал(а) 2025-11-03 16:00:
> So I'm +1 for the idea. I know it's been while since the last patch, 
> and
> unfortunully it hasn't received reviews since then. Do you still plan 
> to
> work on it? I still need to take a look on the code to see if I can 
> help
> with some comments.
> 
> During the tests I got compiler errors due to fce7c73fba4, so I'm
> attaching a v5 with guc_parameters.dat correctly sorted.
> 
> The postgres_fdw/regress tests was also failling due to some whitespace
> problems, v5 also fix this.
> 
> [1] 
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/202510251154.isknefznk566%40alvherre.pgsql
> 

I'm still interested in working on this patch, but it didn't get any 
review (besides internal one). I suppose, Append and MergeAppend nodes 
need some unification, for example, ExecAppendAsyncEventWait and 
ExecMergeAppendAsyncEventWait looks the same, both 
classify_matching_subplans() versions are suspiciously similar. But 
honestly, patch needs thorough review.
-- 
Best regards,
Alexander Pyhalov,
Postgres Professional