Re: Allow logical replication to copy tables in binary format
Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com>
From: "Euler Taveira" <euler@eulerto.com>
To: "Melih Mutlu" <m.melihmutlu@gmail.com>,
pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-08-11T02:03:04Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Allow logical replication to copy tables in binary format.
- ecb696527c01 16.0 landed
-
Common function for percent placeholder replacement
- c96de2ce1782 16.0 cited
-
Doc: add XML ID attributes to <sectN> and <varlistentry> tags.
- 78ee60ed84bb 16.0 cited
-
Re-order disable_on_error in tab-complete.
- d547f7cf5efc 16.0 cited
-
Make subscription tests pass with log_error_verbosity=verbose
- 19408aae7fa2 15.0 cited
-
Weaken type-OID-matching checks in array_recv and record_recv.
- 670c0a1d474b 14.0 cited
-
Allow logical replication to transfer data in binary format.
- 9de77b545313 14.0 cited
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022, at 12:03 PM, Melih Mutlu wrote: > I see that logical replication subscriptions have an option to enable binary [1]. > When it's enabled, subscription requests publisher to send data in binary format. > But this is only the case for apply phase. In tablesync, tables are still copied as text. This option could have been included in the commit 9de77b54531; it wasn't. Maybe it wasn't considered because the initial table synchronization can be a separate step in your logical replication setup idk. I agree that the binary option should be available for the initial table synchronization. > To copy tables, COPY command is used and that command supports copying in binary. So it seemed to me possible to copy in binary for tablesync too. > I'm not sure if there is a reason to always copy tables in text format. But I couldn't see why not to do it in binary if it's enabled. The reason to use text format is that it is error prone. There are restrictions while using the binary format. For example, if your schema has different data types for a certain column, the copy will fail. Even with such restrictions, I think it is worth adding it. > You can find the small patch that only enables binary copy attached. I have a few points about your implementation. * Are we considering to support prior Postgres versions too? These releases support binary mode but it could be an unexpected behavior (initial sync in binary mode) for a publisher using 14 or 15 and a subscriber using 16. IMO you should only allow it for publisher on 16 or later. * Docs should say that the binary option also applies to initial table synchronization and possibly emphasize some of the restrictions. * Tests. Are the current tests enough? 014_binary.pl. -- Euler Taveira EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/