Re: Draft release notes complete

Greg Sabino Mullane <greg@turnstep.com>

From: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com>
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2012-05-15T16:59:58Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. Expose track_iotiming information via pg_stat_statements.

  2. Rewrite GiST support code for rangetypes.

  3. Clean up a couple of box gist helper functions.

  4. Replace the "New Linear" GiST split algorithm for boxes and points with a

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160


Bruce wrote:
> In summary, names on release note items potentially have the 
> following beneficial effects:
>
> *  Encouraging new developers/reviewers
> *  Encouraging long-established developers
> *  Showing appreciation to developers
> *  Assisting future employment for developers
> *  Helping developers get future funding
> *  Assigning responsibility for features
> *  Showing Postgres's increased developer base

The only important ones are:

> * Assisting future employment for developers
> * Helping developers get future funding
> * Assigning responsibility for features
> * Assigning blame for feature problems

That last one is not very important either. If there is a bug, 
you report it. The original author may or may not handle it.

A better way to state some of the above is:

* Quick cross-reference of a person to a feature.

If I claim to have written ON_ERROR_ROLLBACK, nobody should have 
to scroll back through git logs to confirm or deny. (For that matter, 
we should do everything possible to prevent anyone from using 
git log, especially non-developers, for any meta-information.)

+1 to keep things they way they are. If you were significantly invested 
in [re]writing the patch, you get a name. Reviewers, I love you dearly, 
but you don't belong next to the patch. Group them all at the bottom 
if we must have them there.

- -- 
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com/
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201205151259
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAk+yi3cACgkQvJuQZxSWSsiAcACfYC1HCxbMor/c0EJF6kn+XKc9
kOcAoMn0vnOJLa8+HVz5oWKAZxjkOtQi
=eiUT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----