Re: PostgreSQL 15-->18 slowdown?
Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>
From: Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>
To: Israel Brewster <ijbrewster@alaska.edu>,
PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2026-06-26T18:14:56Z
Lists: pgsql-general
On 6/26/26 10:58 AM, Israel Brewster wrote: > In postgreSQL 15, I had the below query that worked quickly. Now, I make > no claims that the query is the best possible, or even a good query, but > it DID work, and it did so quickly enough to be un-noticable when running. > > Then I upgrade to PostgreSQL 18 - and now the query never completes (as > in, I get a command timeout after at least half an hour before I get a > result). Looking at the EXPLAIN (https://explain.depesz.com/s/llAQ > <https://explain.depesz.com/s/llAQ>) makes it pretty obvious why: we > have a sequence scan on a large table inside a nested loop - and that > sequence scan is apparently not short circuiting. The link provided shows no times or rows, did you pick the correct one? > > I tried the obvious: REINDEX database and VACUUM ANALYZE, but neither > helped. I have my default_statistics_target set to 500 at the moment. > > Then I tried SET enable_seqscan = off; Lo and behold, the query ran in > only 123.888 ms (fun number :-D ) - https://explain.depesz.com/s/K2K9 > <https://explain.depesz.com/s/K2K9> This one does not show the actual query. > --- > Israel Brewster > Software Engineer > Alaska Volcano Observatory > Geophysical Institute - UAF > 2156 Koyukuk Drive > Fairbanks AK 99775-7320 > Work: 907-474-5172 > cell: 907-328-9145 >