Re: PostgreSQL 15-->18 slowdown?

Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>
To: Israel Brewster <ijbrewster@alaska.edu>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2026-06-26T18:14:56Z
Lists: pgsql-general

On 6/26/26 10:58 AM, Israel Brewster wrote:
> In postgreSQL 15, I had the below query that worked quickly. Now, I make 
> no claims that the query is the best possible, or even a good query, but 
> it DID work, and it did so quickly enough to be un-noticable when running.
> 
> Then I upgrade to PostgreSQL 18 - and now the query never completes (as 
> in, I get a command timeout after at least half an hour before I get a 
> result). Looking at the EXPLAIN (https://explain.depesz.com/s/llAQ 
> <https://explain.depesz.com/s/llAQ>) makes it pretty obvious why: we 
> have a sequence scan on a large table inside a nested loop - and that 
> sequence scan is apparently not short circuiting.

The link provided shows no times or rows, did you pick the correct one?
> 
> I tried the obvious: REINDEX database and VACUUM ANALYZE, but neither 
> helped. I have my default_statistics_target set to 500 at the moment.
> 
> Then I tried SET enable_seqscan = off; Lo and behold, the query ran in 
> only 123.888 ms (fun number :-D ) - https://explain.depesz.com/s/K2K9 
> <https://explain.depesz.com/s/K2K9>

This one does not show the actual query.


> ---
> Israel Brewster
> Software Engineer
> Alaska Volcano Observatory
> Geophysical Institute - UAF
> 2156 Koyukuk Drive
> Fairbanks AK 99775-7320
> Work: 907-474-5172
> cell:  907-328-9145
>