Re: SQL/JSON features for v15
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>,
Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>,
Nikita Glukhov <n.gluhov@postgrespro.ru>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>,
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>,
John Naylor <john.naylor@enterprisedb.com>
Date: 2022-08-29T21:48:26Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2022-08-29 Mo 09:35, Jonathan S. Katz wrote: > On 8/29/22 8:56 AM, Amit Langote wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 5:11 AM Nikita Glukhov >> <n.gluhov@postgrespro.ru> wrote: > >> I am not sure if it's OK to eval_const_expressions() on a Query >> sub-expression during parse-analysis. IIUC, it is only correct to >> apply it to after the rewriting phase. >> >>> Maybe it would be better to simply remove DEFAULT ON EMPTY. >> >> So +1 to this for now. > > +1, if this simplifies the patch and makes it acceptable for v15 > >>> It is possible to easily split this patch into several subpatches, >>> I will do it if needed. >> >> That would be nice indeed. > > With RMT hat on, the RMT has its weekly meetings on Tuesdays. Based on > the timing of the Beta 4 commit freeze[1] and how both > including/reverting are nontrivial operations (e.g. we should ensure > we're confident in both and that they pass through the buildfarm), we > are going to have to make a decision on how to proceed at the next > meeting. > > Can folks please chime in on what they think of the current patchset > and if this is acceptable for v15? > > I think at a pinch we could probably go with it, but it's a close call. I think it deals with the most pressing issues that have been raised. If people are still worried I think it would be trivial to add in calls that error out of the DEFAULT clauses are used at all. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
Commits
-
JSON_TABLE: Add support for NESTED paths and columns
- bb766cde63b4 17.0 landed
-
Add basic JSON_TABLE() functionality
- de3600452b61 17.0 landed
-
Add SQL/JSON query functions
- 6185c9737cf4 17.0 landed
-
Add soft error handling to some expression nodes
- aaaf9449ec6b 17.0 landed
-
Adjust populate_record_field() to handle errors softly
- 1edb3b491bee 17.0 landed
-
Refactor code used by jsonpath executor to fetch variables
- faa2b953ba3b 17.0 landed
-
Add more SQL/JSON constructor functions
- 03734a7fed7d 17.0 landed
-
SQL/JSON: support the IS JSON predicate
- 6ee30209a6f1 16.0 landed
-
SQL/JSON: add standard JSON constructor functions
- 7081ac46ace8 16.0 landed
-
Revert SQL/JSON features
- 96ef3237bf74 15.0 landed
- 2f2b18bd3f55 16.0 landed
-
Numeric error suppression in jsonpath
- 16d489b0fe05 12.0 cited