Re: Instability of phycodorus in pg_upgrade tests with JIT
Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
From: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>,
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Date: 2025-10-16T19:00:00Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hello Tom and Michael, 16.10.2025 02:39, Tom Lane wrote: > Michael Paquier<michael@paquier.xyz> writes: >> I have spotted a couple of buildfarm failures for buildfarm member >> phycodorus on REL_14_STABLE and REL_13_STABLE: >> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=phycodurus&dt=2025-10-15%2009%3A12%3A36 > phycodorus seems to be running a remarkably ancient LLVM version. > I wonder if we should just write these off as "probably an LLVM bug". I collected all of such failures here: https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Known_Buildfarm_Test_Failures#check-pg_upgrade_fails_on_LLVM-enabled_animals_due_to_double_free_or_corruption Masao-san was going to dig into that: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAHGQGwFcjccSYX+Ap8meEbCccUei-B4tmYsBFu4wMEixKi90fQ@mail.gmail.com Best regards, Alexander