Re: Dividing progress/debug information in pg_standby, and stat before copy

Selena Deckelmann <selenamarie@gmail.com>

From: Selena Deckelmann <selenamarie@gmail.com>

To: Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>

Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>

Date: 2010-01-28T01:13:03Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>> Right, but the question is: is there enough use-case left in it to
>> justify spending community effort on polishing rough edges?  It's not
>> like we haven't got plenty else to do to get 9.0 out the door.
>>
>
> The point I was trying to make is that I'm on the hook to do this particular
> job whether or not the community feels it's worthwhile.  The only real
> decision is whether there's enough interest in upgrading this utility to
> review and possibly commit the result, and I'm trying to minimize the public
> resources needed even for those parts.

I'm interested as well, so happy to continue to work with you on it, Greg.

-selena

-- 
http://chesnok.com/daily - me
http://endpoint.com - work