Re: [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal
David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
From: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>,
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>,
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>,
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>, Vladimir Rusinov <vrusinov@google.com>,
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Euler Taveira <euler@timbira.com.br>,
Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>,
Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com>,
Cynthia Shang <cynthia.shang@crunchydata.com>,
PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-01-26T22:18:26Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 1/26/17 5:07 PM, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Robert Haas (robertmhaas@gmail.com) wrote: >> And I think that's all pretty reasonable. I don't consider this a >> done deal yet. I don't consider your -1 irrelevant. But I don't >> think it's fair to present this as if I am somehow running roughshod >> over community process, either. If a large crew of people show up to >> insist that we should rename only the directories and nothing else, I >> guess I'll have to live with that. But I think that's a bad decision >> that will never survive the passage of time, and there seem to be >> several people who agree with me. > > +1 (to the above, and the rest of Robert's comments on that email). > > For my 2c, I'm also in the crowd of forward or back, but don't leave it > half-done. My preference is certainly to move forward with these > changes, but I understand the process and if there's enough agreement > that we just shouldn't make these changes, then we really shouldn't make > any of them. +1 for forward or back. I prefer forward but would take back over the state we're in now. -- -David david@pgmasters.net
Commits
-
Remove all references to "xlog" from SQL-callable functions in pg_proc.
- 806091c96f9b 10.0 landed
-
Replace pg_shadow and pg_group by new role-capable catalogs pg_authid
- 7762619e9527 8.1.0 cited