Re: pgsql: Clean up role created in new subscription test.

Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-03-30T20:53:03Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> On 30 Mar 2023, at 22:29, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
>>> On 30 Mar 2023, at 20:44, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

>>> Another idea could be for pg_regress to enforce that "select count(*)
>>> from pg_roles" gives the same answer before and after the test run.
> 
>> That wouldn't prevent the contents of pg_roles to have changed though, so there
>> is a (slim) false positive risk with that no?
> 
> Well, we could do "select rolname from pg_roles order by 1" and
> actually compare the results of the two selects.  That might be
> advisable anyway, in order to produce a complaint with useful
> detail when there is something wrong.

I can see the value in doing something like this to keep us honest.

--
Daniel Gustafsson




Commits

  1. Drop global objects after completed test

  2. Fix reported runtime for single tests in pg_regress

  3. Clean up role created in new subscription test.