Re: pgindent run?

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2001-03-22T15:36:24Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>> Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> writes:
> cvs annotate is a really, really handy tool, unfortunetly these
> indent runs remove this very useful tool as well as do a major job
> of obfuscating the code changes.
>> 
>> I think this is a good reason for *not* applying pgindent on an
>> incremental basis, but only once per release cycle.  That at least
>> lets cvs annotate be useful within a cycle.

> What about having it happen on every CVS commit? 

Try that and you'll get all-out war.  It's tough enough keeping in sync
with the repository already.

			regards, tom lane