Re: pgindent run?
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2001-03-22T15:36:24Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: >> Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> writes: > cvs annotate is a really, really handy tool, unfortunetly these > indent runs remove this very useful tool as well as do a major job > of obfuscating the code changes. >> >> I think this is a good reason for *not* applying pgindent on an >> incremental basis, but only once per release cycle. That at least >> lets cvs annotate be useful within a cycle. > What about having it happen on every CVS commit? Try that and you'll get all-out war. It's tough enough keeping in sync with the repository already. regards, tom lane