Re: ALTER EXTENSION ... UPGRADE;
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: jd@commandprompt.com
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>, "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-12-10T20:54:08Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes: > On Fri, 2010-12-10 at 15:42 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> On 12/10/2010 03:24 PM, Josh Berkus wrote: >>> Also, once extensions and pgxn are operating full swing, I see contrib >>> going away anyway ... >> We've heard this before, but I'm still quite skeptical about it. Quite >> apart from anything else we should keep enough extensions in core to >> test the extension mechanism, as well as to provide examples as part of >> the base distribution. Some (e.g. hstore and citext) should probably >> move into core. Others like pgcrypto are probably in just the right >> place as they are. > I hope that contrib goes away. I agree with your assertion that things > like hstore and citext shoudl be in core but it is my hope that with > extensions and pgxn, there will be no reason for contrib to exist at > all. I agree with Andrew --- we're going to need a collection of "standard extensions" if only for testing purposes. It may someday not be called contrib, but it'll still be there. regards, tom lane