Horton

Re: New gist vacuum.

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>
Cc: Michail Nikolaev <michail.nikolaev@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2018-03-02T16:25:35Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru> writes:
> So, I agree, unconditional counting is a good idea. Here's the v3 patch.

Pushed with trivial cosmetic adjustments.

I've marked the CF entry as committed; please make a new CF entry in
2018-09 for the other patch.  I'd also suggest starting a new email
thread for that.  Linking the CF entry to a years-old thread doesn't
make it easy for people to find what's the current submission.

			regards, tom lane

Commits

  1. Make gistvacuumcleanup() count the actual number of index tuples.