Re: ps_status on fastpath

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> I noticed that the fastpath code doesn't update ps_status, which would
> be harmless except that it leads to "idle in transaction" being logged
> in log_line_prefix for the command tag.

> Are there objections to applying this?

Hm, what about pgstat_report_activity()?

Is anyone concerned about the added overhead for fastpath calls?

			regards, tom lane