Re: Enabling Checksums

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2012-12-17T19:29:21Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> Discussing this makes me realise that we need a more useful response
> than just "your data is corrupt", so user can respond "yes, I know,
> I'm trying to save whats left".

> We'll need a way of expressing some form of corruption tolerance.
> zero_damaged_pages is just insane, much better if we set
> corruption_tolerance = N to allow us to skip N corrupt pages before
> failing, with -1 meaning keep skipping for ever. Settable by superuser
> only.

Define "skip".  Extra points if it makes sense for an index.  And what
about things like pg_clog pages?

			regards, tom lane