Re: selects from large tables

"Charles H. Woloszynski" <chw@clearmetrix.com> writes:
> Are you doing vaccums on these tables?  I was under the understanding 
> that the estimated row count should be close to the real row count 
> returned, and when it is not (as it looks in your case), the primary 
> reason for the disconnect is that the stats for the tables are 
> out-of-date.  

The fact that he's using 7.1 doesn't help any; the statistics mechanisms
in 7.1 are pretty weak compared to 7.2.

> Also, do you do any clustering of the data (since the queries are mostly 
> time limited)?  I am wondering if the system is doing lots of seeks to 
> get the data (implying that the data is all over the disk and not 
> clustered).

It would also be interesting to try a two-column index ordered the other
way (timestamp as the major sort key instead of ID).  Can't tell if that
will be a win without more info about the data properties, but it's
worth looking at.

			regards, tom lane