Re: Vote totals for SET in aborted transaction
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>
Cc: Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2002-04-29T17:04:52Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee> writes: > If we go with your syntax I would prefer SET LOCAL to LOCAL SET , so > that LOCAL feels tied more to variable rather than to SET . I agree. I was originally thinking that that way might require LOCAL to become a reserved word, but we should be able to avoid it. With Thomas' nearby suggestion of SET SESSION ..., we'd have SET [ SESSION | LOCAL ] varname TO value and it only remains to argue which case is the default ;-) regards, tom lane