Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Preventive maintenance in advance of pgindent run.

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2017-05-17T17:06:26Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> No, the previous setup hasn't been "in place for years".  These programs
>> were only NLS-ified last fall.

> We use the same technique in other places such as pg_dump's help() too.

Meh.  Well, I reverted the changes in question while we discuss it.

Changing the pgindent rule for such cases sounds kind of promising,
but will anyone pursue it?

(In any case, we should probably go ahead with the scheduled pgindent
run, and then we can consider a new run with new rules later; that
will ease seeing exactly what changes a new rule would make.)

			regards, tom lane


Commits

  1. Manually un-break a few URLs that pgindent used to insist on splitting.

  2. Remove entab and associated detritus.

  3. Phase 3 of pgindent updates.

  4. Phase 2 of pgindent updates.

  5. Initial pgindent run with pg_bsd_indent version 2.0.

  6. Adjust pgindent script to use pg_bsd_indent 2.0.

  7. Final pgindent run with old pg_bsd_indent (version 1.3).

  8. Re-run pgindent.

  9. Preventive maintenance in advance of pgindent run.