Re: logical decoding : exceeded maxAllocatedDescs for .spill files
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan.pg@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera from 2ndQuadrant <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Juan José Santamaría Flecha <juanjo.santamaria@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Date: 2020-01-12T03:53:57Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
When a TAP file has non-zero exit status, retain temporary directories.
- 048c7ccd7d6d 9.6.17 landed
- d8efc5900f7c 10.12 landed
- 887657d183fc 11.7 landed
- 78a26c3edd85 12.2 landed
- bf989aaf3561 13.0 landed
-
Fix running out of file descriptors for spill files.
- 1ad47e8757bb 9.4.26 landed
- a6f4f407ada0 9.5.21 landed
- 27b5f48c79f7 10.12 landed
- 3e3a79735235 11.7 landed
- f8a6d8e71b17 12.2 landed
- d20703805383 13.0 landed
- ba5b4e506489 9.6.17 landed
-
Track statistics for spilling of changes from ReorderBuffer.
- 9290ad198b15 13.0 cited
-
Handle ReadFile() EOF correctly on Windows.
- 2189f49c420f 12.2 landed
- 6969deeb8d39 13.0 landed
-
Add logical_decoding_work_mem to limit ReorderBuffer memory usage.
- cec2edfa7859 13.0 cited
-
Generational memory allocator
- a4ccc1cef5a0 11.0 cited
-
Support retaining data dirs on successful TAP tests
- 90627cf98a8e 11.0 cited
Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 07:40:12PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> It seems reasonably likely to me that this result is telling us about >> an actual bug, ie, faulty back-patching of one or more of those fixes >> into v10 and perhaps earlier branches. > Well, one thing we did in 11 is introduction of the Generation context. > In 10 we're still stashing all tuple data into the main AllocSet. I > wonder if backporting a4ccc1cef5a04cc054af83bc4582a045d5232cb3 and a > couple of follow-up fixes would make the issue go away. Hm. I'm loath to back-port Generation contexts. But looking at a4ccc1cef5a04cc054af83bc4582a045d5232cb3, I see that (a) the commit message mentions space savings, but (b) the replaced code in reorderbuffer.c doesn't look like it really would move the needle much in that regard. The old code had a one-off slab allocator that we got rid of, but I don't see any actual leak there ... remind me where the win came from, exactly? regards, tom lane